I have a book of Pulitzer Prize-winning photos. The kind that are inspiring and the kind that hurt you to look at but you must look at them anyway to feel the pain and the loss and remember that our world and its people are far from perfect. Far from civilized.
I was fortunate to come upon the image of the Vancouver Kissing Couple the day after their image went viral. By then, they had been identified and the truth about their story was being told - and even updated constantly - to diminish the notion that these were two amorous anarchists who wanted to exemplify the notion of making love, not war (it was a girl knocked over by the riot police, who's boyfriend lay down next to her to provide comfort and photographer Rich Lam, working for Getty Images, caught their moment), but more importantly, to stress that the image is not a fake.
I missed the initial viralification of the image and the inevitable attempts at memage. I missed the opportunity to wonder if the image was fake; if it was staged. By seeing the image first attached to the true story, I did not get that jaded feeling that modern technology has inflicted upon us.
It made me sad to see so much skepticism and even condemnation, proclaiming the image a staged fake. All because we are so used to our world now being staged and photoshopped for our viewing pleasure and amusement.
Now we will demand to see pictures, lest we won't believe something to be true, but when we are given the pictures, we refuse to believe they have not been altered. It's hard not to be cynical when even the experts fall for the tricks:
"No matter how forthright one is about alterations, fake photos cause collateral damage.” wrote photo editor Rob Haggart in a piece called “This Photo Is Lying To You” "They devalue the work of photographers with the skills and patience to capture awing images in real time. Even worse, modern photo manipulation is seriously screwing up our concept of reality and our willingness to believe what we see in magazines like Outside.”
While the altering of images is rampant now, with anyone and their mother able to use Photoshop, it is not new:
(1) The reality of photojournalism is that you can walk into any newspaper in the country and given the opportunity to view their hardcopy photo morgue from 30-40 years ago, you will find images manipulated by pencil, pen or marker.
(2) After all manipulation of photographs has been an on going practice in the dark room since photography came into existence.
Back then, the reasoning was perhaps to place a ball where a sports photographer had missed it in his shot. Cameras were much slower then and picked up less detail. We no longer have that excuse. Now photos are altered simply to exaggerate, lie or to offer proof of a lie.
How can anyone tell or show the truth, if we no longer know how to believe them?